My son and I have been watching
the entire series of the TV show “House, M.D.” A few days ago, we started the
sixth season. In one episode, a maniacal genocidal dictator, who was visiting
the United States, gets ill and comes under the care of Greg House’s team at
the hospital. Throughout the show, one of the team members, Cameron, struggles
with helping this dictator get well because she fears she will then be
complicit in any deaths he brings about in the future. Others on the team keep
telling her that their jobs as doctors are not to pass judgment on their
patient, but to cure him. The conflict builds and finally Cameron’s husband,
Chase, who is also on the team, becomes convinced that this dictator is going
to commit genocide against many thousands of his own people if he recovers and
goes back to his home country. He can’t bear that thought, so switches a blood
sample to make it look like the dictator has a medical problem he does not
have. The treatment will most certainly kill him given what they believed his real
condition was. The plan succeeds, the dictator dies, and now Chase must figure
out how to cover up his actions and fight his inner demons.
Moral dilemmas in TV shows and
movies have always intrigued me. They push me to evaluate how I would response
if put in a similar situation. The answer is not always easy. In fact, more
often than not, I am left not really knowing for sure what I would do.
During World War II, there were
quite a few Germans who saw Hitler for what he really was, which was a maniacal
genocidal dictator like the one in the “House, M.D.” episode. Some of these
astute citizens realized they needed to stop Hitler before he destroyed their
country. Several assassination attempts were unsuccessfully carried out. I
often wonder how those people, had they been successful at assassinating
Hitler, would be viewed by the world. Most assuredly the German military would
have executed them for treason. But much of the rest of the world would have viewed
them as heroes and martyrs.
It is interesting how varied
people’s opinions can be over the same actions of others. In most of the cop
shows, the main issue is justice. Someone mistreats other people and the police
talk about bringing that person to justice. In other movies like “John Wick,”
the issue is revenge. Someone did something bad, and the victim won’t stop
until he gets his vengeance against the perpetrator. In religious shows, the
emphasis is oftentimes placed on forgiveness. Rather than seeking justice or
revenge, seek to forgive the person who transgressed against you. Yet in other
shows, the emphasis is salvation. Consider the movie “Taken.” A man’s daughter
is kidnapped and about to be sold into slavery. Since the man has “certain
skills,” he goes on a rampage to save his daughter. He is not driven by justice
or revenge, but rather solely by rescuing his daughter from the hands of evil.
Anyone who stands in his way is a target of his wrath.
This afternoon, my wife and I
went to see the movie “The Shack.” I had read the book many years ago but,
given the inefficiency of my long-term memory, could not recall much about it.
The basis of the movie is that a young daughter of the main character is
kidnapped and killed. The father struggles with this as does his wife and two
other children. He gets an invitation from God to return to the shack where his
daughter was murdered. There his judgmental mentality and his inability to
forgive others is challenged. And, interestingly, a question that I had just challenged
my wife and son with at lunch earlier was asked in the movie. “How does one
decide what is good and what is evil?” If you think deeply about this, the
answer may not be as obvious as it seems at first glance.
Now, ask yourself, “Which
response to evil do you like the best?” Revenge? Justice? Forgiveness?
Salvation? If you are like me, I think perhaps you might be saying, “I like
them all.” I cheer on John Wick as he leaves a trail of dead bodies in his wake
while seeking revenge on the man who stole his car, killed his dog, and knocked
him unconscious. I applaud the police officers who relentlessly investigate a
murder and finally bring in the murderer so justice can be served. I cry at the
struggle victims go through to forgive the criminal who did them wrong. I urge
on the man who will do anything to save the person he loves.
So, what’s going on? Do I have
multiple personalities living within my brain? Am I simply crazy? Or is it
simply coded into my DNA, and perhaps yours as well, to want all these things
to occur simultaneously? Is that even possible?
Upon thinking about these
questions, I have concluded that it is possible. Revenge seeks to teach an evil
person how deep the pain of what they did was by having that person experience
that same pain. Justice seeks to right a wrong, as much as humanly possible, by
taking them out of society, thus making it impossible to perpetrate the same
evil on others. Forgiveness seeks protection of yourself by letting the past go
and to quit obsessing over the evil that occurred. Salvation seeks to prevent
harm to a loved one and perhaps prevent additional harm to others. A
combination of these things can be both therapeutic and good for society as a
whole. While all four of these reactions are legitimate, different situations
call for a differing mix of the four.
I don’t pretend to have it all
figured out, but I do have an inkling of how these four reactions should be
applied. For instance, while seeking vengeance, you must not cross a line that
ends up making you the evil one. When seeking justice, one must be certain,
usually through a trial process, that the right person is being punished. When
seeking to forgive, you should not “deal with the devil” or place yourself or
others in danger. When seeking to save, one must be confident that the actions
they take do not end up bringing harm to the one you are trying to save.
Accomplishing these things will most likely not be easy. Mistakes will often be
made, but doing nothing will probably end badly.
After watching “The Shack,” I
told my wife that I view some movies as following the Old Testament, where we
typically think of God acting out of vengeance and justice, while other movies
are like the New Testament, where God is defined by forgiveness and salvation.
I like a little of both. Concerning forgiveness, I should note that there are
actually three levels of forgiveness: 1) letting go, 2) no punishment, and 3)
restored relationship. “The Shack” only addresses the first. That level of
forgiveness is difficult, but the other two are much more so. For a complete
explanation, please see my book, “God Is:
Exploring the Nature of the Biblical God.”
No comments:
Post a Comment